Royalties, mainly on
the sale of paper based books, remain the primary source of author income.
I'm going to explain the fundamental concepts you need to understand how
they work and are calculated. The following is an outline, more like course
notes, than a lecture. I want to keep this short and to the point, as my
workshop will go into more depth about all these topics.
Let's start with the
basics. Royalties are wonderful. Royalties are the one thing that compensates
you for all the difficult deals you have to accept in the course of your
working lives as authors. Royalties are the safety net under the whole system.
Did you not get an advance?
A $1 advance? A $4,000 advance? If the book succeeds and earns royalties,
you can laugh about it. No matter how cheaply you sell a book, no matter
how poor the prospects, no matter how pitiful the advance, as long as the
royalty is strong, you do have a chance at realizing good income from that
book. I'll never forget the first time I held a six figure royalty check
in my hand. It was the first royalty check I received for that book and
it was 4 times the advance we got.
So what makes a strong
royalty? Luckily, the royalty system, though under assault, is initially
a good one for authors. The reason for this is that the basic royalty for
commercial books is a percentage of the cover price of that book. If the
cover price of a hardcover book is $20 and my royalty is 10% of the cover
price, I am receiving $2 per book. That's a full 10% of what the consumer
pays.
Let me show you how
good that really is. You may think the publisher is seeing 90% of that sale
or $18, but that's not so. The publisher does little direct selling, instead
he must use bookstores and other distributors. To keep the numbers simple
let's assume he's granting a 50% discount to everyone who will take the
book, display it, and actually make the sale. This is not far off from the
discounts many publishers do grant. So on our $20 book, he's giving $10
to the bookstore and $2 to the author. That leaves $8, which per book isn't
bad. But then there's the cost of being a publisher, which goes way beyond
a good computer and a corner of the house. There's rent, salaries, taxes,
paper, print, binding, publicity, et cetera. Historically, publishers' margins,
the amount of money left over after expenses have been deducted, have been
10%. That's about as small a margin as you can get in a relatively low volume
business and still be in business.
So a percentage of the
cover price of a book is a strong, fundamental position to be in. Authors
and agents should do everything they can to perserve it. (More on that later.)
Beyond showing you that the cover price royalty is so valuable, I want to
contrast it with other royalty calculation systems.
There are large groups
of publishers that do not pay a cover price royalty. In fact, a number of
royalties in your commercial publishing contracts are not cover price based
at all. They are based on the "amount received." Structurally, this is a
far less good royalty for authors.
An "amount received"
royalty means that the author's royalty is calculated on the monies that
the publisher actually receives and not the cover price of the book. Academic
publishers like university presses have traditionally paid on amount received.
I've worked with a number of small and not so small publishers that only
pay on the amount received.
Let's go back to our
$20 book. The publisher is once again granting a 50% discount to the bookseller.
So the publisher is getting $10. Now my royalty is calculated based on the
money the publisher is receiving. I'm now getting 10% of $10, not $20. So,
now my royalty is $1 per book. This is half of my previous royalty. If the
royalty system for commercial publishers ever shifted to this model, it
would be a catastrophic disaster for authors.
I've used a very
simple example to contrast cover price vs. amount received royalty. Of
course, there are mitigating factors. The most important one is that
academic presses do not grant 50% discounts, their upper limit is usually 30%. So, the amount
received would be larger. There are other ways to also cope with the amount
received royalty structure, which I routinely employ. I double the nominal
royalty. So, if a publisher is unwilling to pay 10% of the cover price,
I ask for 20% of the amount received. This isn't a fantasy. I often get
amount received royalties which are double the cover price royalty just
to compensate my author for the different royalty structure.
Now that we've realized
the value of the cover price royalty, we can better examine the full extent
of royalties in a commercial publishing contract. The picture gets far more
complex and troubling quickly. The cover price royalty usually only applies
to sales of the book below a certain discount, in normal book channels.
That means that many sales of the book are paid out under a different royalty
structure, and that structure is usually on the amount received.
Let's consider some
of these.
All publishers sell
their U.S. based books outside of the United States. As a general rule of
thumb foreign sales--books exported to Canada and accounts all over the
world that take English language books -- account for 10% of sales. The
average royalty here is often 5% of the amount received. That would equal
a cover price royalty of 2 1/2% of cover price. That is a very small royalty.
There are other foreign
or export royalties. Some publishers pay more than 5% of the amount received.
Some publishers have special cover price royalties for large, overseas English
speaking markets like Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand
and South Africa. Large publishers that maintain full publishing operations
in these large English speaking markets, plug their American books, which
have multiple local cover prices actually printed on them, into their local
distribution networks and pay cover price royalties in these markets. The
local currency is converted and paid in U.S. dollars. These are attractive
arrangements and attractive royalties, but only a few large publishers actually
do this. So, the export royalty is a real problem. It's true the freight
costs of shipping overseas are higher. But that hardly accounts for the
drastic royalty drop. Strong accounts in Canada, the Caribbean, etc., do
well with English language books. I believe the export royalty is unnecessarily
rich for the publishers.
Another major area of
concern is discount. The cover price royalty only prevails below certain
discounts granted to the bookseller or distributor. For hardcover books,
it's usually below 48%. For trade paperback books, it's often below 55%.
For mass market paperback books, it's often below 60%. But these discounts
vary widely from publisher to publisher. The royalty paid when these discounts
are exceeded also varies substantially.
Let's return to our
basic example and see what happens when the "high discount" royalty clause
is invoked. The publisher's standard cover price royalty is paid below discounts
of 48% percent. But for a substantial number of sales in our example, the
publisher is granting a 50% discount. For each additional point of discount
granted, the publisher is deducting 1 point of royalty. So at a 50% discount,
2 royalty points are deducted. We are now receiving an 8% royalty. So our
original $2 per book is now $1.60 per book ($20 x .08).
It can get a lot worse
than that, very quickly. Some publishers immediately go to an amount received
royalty of 10% of the amount received when the discount is exceeded. I have
in my files royalty statements from one particular publisher where a full
80% of all sales are made at the special discount (49% of more). As you
can clearly see, there are financial incentives for the publisher to exceed
their traditional discounts. They may be giving their distributors a better
break, which isn't a bad thing for customer relations, but who's really
paying for this break? If the author's royalty is cut in half when the discount
shifts one point from 48% to 49%, it certainly isn't the publisher. Authors
may not have an opinion about to whom and what kind of discounts publishers
should grant to nourish their businesses, but they better take a very active
interest in how discounting impacts their royalties.
Another important area
to consider is the whole area of special sales and sales outside the trade.
A lot of different sales are covered here, far too many for me to explore
in this handout. Let me just enumerate the issues that demand your attention.
First is the concept
of "outside the book trade." The concept here is that because the publisher
is selling outside of his normal channels of distribution, some special
effort or some unique customer is involved and the traditional royalties
don't apply. This is a very tricky area if amount received royalties are
being paid. The "normal channels of distribution" have changed and are changing
rapidly. I don't believe this is a valid concept and I think publishing
contracts need to be policed so that full royalty are paid on all these
sales unless they exceed the normal discounts.
Other special sales
include premium sales, which are bulk sales often to a single customer,
often not for re-sale. They are also often non-returnable. Again a 5% of
amount received royalty is paid. This is another very profitable area for
publishers. Similarly there are mail order sales and direct response sales,
which again command the 5% of amount received royalties. There are also
publisher owned book clubs, which similarly pay a low royalty. We can debate
the economics of these sales. From where I sit, the author is making a substantial,
excessive contribution to their success by taking such a small royalty.
Finally, we have the
whole new world of electronic publishing. This is an area that is still
taking shape and there is no industry protocol. There are competing technologies
and new players of various sorts. As I write this I can identify three main
new formats that need to be considered. The three formats I see are print
on demand copies, electronic copies for reading in a stand-alone device
and electronic copies that are intended to be read over a personal computer.
Print on demand copies may pose no change to the royalty system, since they
can be treated just like a printed book. Or, perhaps a new royalty is needed
here. Electronic versions are far more unprecedented from a royalty point
of view. Established publishers are treating them like paper bound books
for royalty purposes and paying "standard" royalties. Some start up electronic
publishers are paying royalties of up to 50% of the monies received for
each sale. Space forbids me from fully articulating my views here. Suffice
it to say that we must be vigilant in making sure the new royalty protocols
for electronic books are advantageous to authors.
There are two other
areas I want to mention to round out the royalty issue. When we talk about
royalties, we're talking about money and when we're talking about money
we're talking about the most basic business concept "cash flow." This is
not a hard concept to understand. You all innately understand it. It's having
the money you need when you need it. Not 3 months from now, not 6 months
from now, NOW!
Cash flow is effected
by when a publisher begins to pay royalties and how quickly they are actually
paid out. Some publishers won't pay royalties until they have at least 6
months of sale on a book, some don't require that. Some account to authors
within 60 days after the close of a royalty period, some enter into the
5th month after the close of a royalty period before they pay out. All these
things do affect your income.
The final area I want
to mention is returns and the reserve for returns. The publishers struggle
with one very basic fact of their doing business: when they ship a book
to an account, it is not a sale. It is essentially on consignment. Books
are fully returnable, usually indefinitely. That means that if an account
returns all 20 of the copies of our $20 book to the publisher, the publisher
makes no money, and, in fact, has lost money on shipping it both ways, plus
the loss of income from having no sale anyway. Because books are returnable,
completely at the publisher's expense, it has been traditionally very difficult
to know exactly how a book has done. You may know where 80% of the copies
are, or even 90%, but you certainly don't know where 100% of the copies
are. They may be sold or they may be returned one year or more after shipping.
The reserve for returns, which literally means some "sold" copies are "reserved"
or held back from being paid as royalties to the author because it's not
really known whether they have sold or not.
Returns dramatically
add an element of complexity, uncertainty and controversy to royalty accounting.
There have been abuses. When a royalty accountant looks at some basic numbers,
it's often a matter of interpretation to determine how many books have actually
been sold. Because thousands of dollars of the publisher's money is at stake,
any royalty clerk who wants to keep their job is bound to be conservative.
But that can savage author incomes. If a book is selling well, continues
to be reprinted and averages a total return of 10% over the first year of
sale, how can an industry average of a 30% reserve be justified? It can't.
But I've seen it. A few years back there was a legal settlement that revealed
that one publisher was essentially keeping a permanent reserve of 30% on
all their books, regardless of their real sales history.
There is an antidote
to the issue of excessive reserves, though it's difficult to apply. Authors
should maintain accurate records and aggressively seek sales information
on their books. Royalty statements must be carefully examined to catch mistakes
and to track the actual sales experience of a book. I routinely write letters
of query to publishers when I find anomalies in royalty statements or when
a statement does not conform to my sense of how a book did. Two years back
one such letter resulted in a check for $7,000. Stay on top of your royalty
income and potential.
I hope this basic background
information gives you a better sense of how important royalties are and
how they operate. This will continue to be a dynamic, complex, fundamentally
important area of author concern. Protect your income by advocating for
practices that preserve and increase author royalty income where appropriate.
This is a handout given
out at a talk at the RWA National Conference, July 1999.